Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPapoutsis, Iosif
dc.contributor.authorKnudtsen, Ingerid Skjei
dc.contributor.authorSande, Erlend Peter Skaug
dc.contributor.authorRekstad, Bernt Louni
dc.contributor.authorÖllers, Michel
dc.contributor.authorvan Elmpt, Wouter
dc.contributor.authorArnesen, Marius Røthe
dc.contributor.authorMalinen, Eirik
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-18T12:41:42Z
dc.date.available2023-01-18T12:41:42Z
dc.date.created2022-05-02T13:49:32Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationPhysics and imaging in radiation oncology (PIRO). 2022, 21 101-107.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2405-6316
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3044311
dc.description.abstractBackground and purpose Dose painting by numbers (DPBN) require a high degree of dose modulation to fulfill the image-based voxel wise dose prescription. The aim of this study was to assess the dosimetric accuracy of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography(18F-FDG-PET)-based DPBN in an anthropomorphic lung phantom using alanine dosimetry. Materials and methods A linear dose prescription based on 18F-FDG-PET image intensities within the gross tumor volume (GTV) of a lung cancer patient was employed. One DPBN scheme with low dose modulation (Scheme A; minimum/maximum fraction dose to the GTV 2.92/4.26 Gy) and one with a high modulation (Scheme B; 2.81/4.52 Gy) were generated. The plans were transferred to a computed tomograpy (CT) scan of a thorax phantom based on CT images of the patient. Using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), DPBN was delivered to the phantom with embedded alanine dosimeters. A plan was also delivered to an intentionally misaligned phantom. Absorbed doses at various points in the phantom were measured by alanine dosimetry. Results A pointwise comparison between GTV doses from prescription, treatment plan calculation and VMAT delivery showed high correspondence, with a mean and maximum dose difference of <0.1 Gy and 0.3 Gy, respectively. No difference was found in dosimetric accuracy between scheme A and B. The misalignment caused deviations up to 1 Gy between prescription and delivery. Conclusion DPBN can be delivered with high accuracy, showing that the treatment may be applied correctly from a dosimetric perspective. Still, misalignment may cause considerable dosimetric erros, indicating the need for patient immobilization and monitoring.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Scienceen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePositron emission tomography guided dose painting by numbers of lung cancer: Alanine dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantomen_US
dc.title.alternativePositron emission tomography guided dose painting by numbers of lung cancer: Alanine dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantomen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber101-107en_US
dc.source.volume21en_US
dc.source.journalPhysics and imaging in radiation oncology (PIRO)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.phro.2022.02.013
dc.identifier.cristin2020698
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal