Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHoward, Jack
dc.contributor.authorLipscombe, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorBeovich, Bronwyn
dc.contributor.authorGrusd, Eystein
dc.contributor.authorShepherd, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorNudell, Nikiah G.
dc.contributor.authorRice, Don
dc.contributor.authorOlaussen, Alexander
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-07T08:49:53Z
dc.date.available2022-12-07T08:49:53Z
dc.date.created2022-11-28T20:19:22Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2666-5204
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3036262
dc.description.abstractBackground CPR-Induced Consciousness is an emerging phenomenon with a paucity of consensus guidelines from peak resuscitative bodies. Local prehospital services have had to implement their own CPR-Induced Consciousness guidelines. This scoping review aims to identify prehospital CPR-Induced Consciousness guidelines and compare or contrast their management options. Objective The purpose of this scoping review is to identify and compare as many prehospital CPR-Induced Consciousness guidelines as feasible, highlight common management trends, and discuss the factors that might impact CPR-Induced Consciousness guidelines and the management trends identified. Design To search for prehospital CPR-Induced Consciousness guidelines, a bibliographical search of five databases was undertaken (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Scopus, and CINAHL plus). Also included was a grey literature search arm, comprised of four search strategies: 1. Customised Google search, 2. Hand searching of targeted websites, 3. Grey literature databases, 4. Consultation with subject experts. Results Our search extracted 23 prehospital CPR-Induced Consciousness guidelines and one good practise statement from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Of the 23 prehospital guidelines available, we identified 20 different ways of treating CPR-Induced Consciousness. Midazolam was the most frequently used drug to treat CPR-Induced Consciousness (14/23, 61%), followed by Ketamine (11/23, 48%) and Fentanyl (9/23, 39%). Conclusion Prehospital CPR-Induced Consciousness guidelines are both exceptionally uncommon and vary substantially from each other. This has a flow-on effect towards data collection and only serves to continue CPR-Induced Consciousness’s relatively unknown status surrounding both knowledge of, and the effect CPR-Induced Consciousness treatment has on cardiac arrest outcomes.en_US
dc.description.abstractPre-hospital guidelines for CPR-Induced Consciousness (CPRIC): A scoping reviewen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePre-hospital guidelines for CPR-Induced Consciousness (CPRIC): A scoping reviewen_US
dc.title.alternativePre-hospital guidelines for CPR-Induced Consciousness (CPRIC): A scoping reviewen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume12en_US
dc.source.journalResuscitation Plusen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100335
dc.identifier.cristin2083161
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal