Removing the bad apples: A simple bioinformatic method to improve loci-recovery in de novo RADseq data for non-model organisms
Cerca, José; Maurstad, Marius Filomeno; Rochette, Nicolas C.; Rivera-Colón, Angel G.; Rayamajhi, Niraj; Catchen, Julian M.; Struck, Torsten H
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Published version
![Thumbnail](/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2990360/Cerca%2b-%2bRemoving%2bthe%2bbad%2bapples%2b%2bA%2bsimple%2bbioinformatic%2bmethod%2bto%2bimprove%2bloci%25E2%2580%2590recovery%2bin%2bde.pdf.jpg?sequence=5&isAllowed=y)
Åpne
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2990360Utgivelsesdato
2021Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
- Institutt for naturhistorie [1241]
- Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - NTNU [38484]
Sammendrag
1. The restriction site-associated DNA (RADseq) family of protocols involves digesting DNA and sequencing the region flanking the cut site, thus providing a cost and time-efficient way for obtaining thousands of genomic markers. However, when working with non-model taxa with few genomic resources, optimization of RADseq wet-lab and bioinformatic tools may be challenging, often resulting in allele dropout—that is when a given RADseq locus is not sequenced in one or more individuals resulting in missing data. Additionally, as datasets include divergent taxa, rates of dropout will increase since restriction sites may be lost due to mutation. Mitigating the impacts of allele dropout is crucial, as missing data may lead to incorrect inferences in population genetics and phylogenetics.
2. Here, we demonstrate a simple pipeline for the optimization of RADseq datasets which involves partitioning datasets into subgroups, namely by reducing and analysing the dataset at a population or species level. By running the software Stacks at a subgroup level, we were able to reliably identify and remove individuals with high levels of missing data (bad apples) likely stemming from artefacts in library preparation, DNA quality or sequencing artefacts.
3. Removal of the bad apples generally led to an increase in loci and decrease in missing data in the final datasets.
4. The biological interpretability of the data, as measured by the number of retrieved loci and missing data, was considerably increased.