dc.contributor.author | Gordt, Katharina | |
dc.contributor.author | Nerz, Corinna | |
dc.contributor.author | Mikolaizak, A. Stefanie | |
dc.contributor.author | Taraldsen, Kristin | |
dc.contributor.author | Pijnappels, Mirjam | |
dc.contributor.author | Helbostad, Jorunn L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Vereijken, Beatrix | |
dc.contributor.author | Becker, Clemens | |
dc.contributor.author | Schwenk, Michael | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-18T09:56:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-18T09:56:38Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-12-06T19:18:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2021, 102 (11), 2102-2108. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-9993 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2986130 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective
To examine sensitivity to change and responsiveness of the Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CBM) and shortened CBM (s-CBM).
Design
Secondary analysis using data of a randomized controlled trial.
Setting
General community.
Participants
Young community-dwelling seniors aged 61-70 years (N=134; mean age, 66.2±2.5y).
Interventions
Participants underwent 12 months of exercise intervention.
Main Outcome Measures
CBM and s-CBM. Sensitivity to change was assessed using standardized response mean (SRM) and paired t tests as appropriate. Responsiveness was assessed using 2 minimal important difference (MID) estimates. Analyses were conducted for the full sample and for the subgroups “high-balance” and “low-balance,” divided by median split.
Results
Inferential statistics revealed a significant CBM (P<.001) and s-CBM (P<.001) improvement within the full sample and the subgroups (high-balance: P=.001, P=.019; low-balance: P<.001, P<.001). CBM and s-CBM were moderately sensitive to change (SRM, 0.48 vs 0.38) within the full sample. In the high-balance subgroup, moderate SRM values (0.70) were found for the CBM and small values for the s-CBM (0.29). In the low-balance subgroup, moderate SRM values were found for the CBM (0.67) and high values for the s-CBM (0.80). For the full sample, CBM and s-CBM exceeded the lower but not the higher MID value. In the high-balance subgroup, the CBM exceeded both MID values, but the s-CBM exceeded only the lower. In the low-balance subgroup, CBM and s-CBM exceeded both MID values.
Conclusions
The CBM is a suitable tool to detect intervention-related changes of balance and mobility in young, high-performing seniors. Both versions of the CBM scale show good sensitivity to change and responsiveness, particularly in young seniors with low balance. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.title | Sensitivity to Change and Responsiveness of the Original and the Shortened Version of the Community Balance and Mobility Scale for Young Seniors | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | This version of the article will not be available due to copyright restrictions by Elsevier | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 2102-2108 | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 102 | en_US |
dc.source.journal | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | en_US |
dc.source.issue | 11 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.036 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1965293 | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |