Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAgerbo Rasmussen, Jacob
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Martin
dc.contributor.authorMak, Sarah Siu Tze
dc.contributor.authorDöring, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorKlincke, Franziska
dc.contributor.authorGopalakrishnan, Shyam
dc.contributor.authorDunn, Robert R.
dc.contributor.authorKauer, Randolf
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Marcus Thomas Pius
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-28T15:00:48Z
dc.date.available2022-02-28T15:00:48Z
dc.date.created2021-09-23T12:48:24Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental DNA. 2021, 3 (1), 70-82.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2637-4943
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2981839
dc.description.abstractThere is growing interest in the application of sustainable agricultural methods to minimize the environmental impact of farming and thus aiding quantification of the actual benefit that such approaches may confer. We applied DNA metabarcoding with the aim of exploring how the diversity of fungi and arthropods were affected by different agricultural management systems (integrated, organic, biodynamic) at the experimental vineyard of Geisenheim (Rheingau, Germany). Data were generated for the bloom and harvest periods in 2017, using environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding analysis of both soil and vane trap samples. Our data revealed four principal results. (a) Overall richness of vane trap samples was unaffected by the management systems, likely due to the relatively small scale of the plots compared to the ranges of taxa such as the arthropods caught. In contrast, however, the richness of soil-living taxa appeared to be negatively affected by conventional treatments, especially at harvest. (b) Analysis of similarity revealed that the species composition was significantly differentiated by management systems for both fungal and other taxa in both sample types. (c) Taxonomic analysis of fungi revealed that the management system drove differentiation in the abundance patterns for wine-related fungi. Overall, our study reiterates the potential of eDNA techniques as a tool for assessing how biodiversity is affected by different agricultural management regimes, and we hope such approaches will be adopted in future research aimed at guiding vineyard management decisions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleeDNA-based biomonitoring at an experimental German vineyard to characterize how management regimes shape ecosystem diversityen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber70-82en_US
dc.source.volume3en_US
dc.source.journalEnvironmental DNAen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/edn3.131
dc.identifier.cristin1937613
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal