Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHøisæter, Åse
dc.contributor.authorArp, Hans Peter
dc.contributor.authorSlinde, Gøril
dc.contributor.authorKnutsen, Heidi
dc.contributor.authorHale, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorBreedveld, Gijs D.
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Mona Cecilie
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-15T11:12:31Z
dc.date.available2022-02-15T11:12:31Z
dc.date.created2021-07-21T12:28:51Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationScience of the Total Environment. 2021, 794 1-9.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2979061
dc.description.abstractIn situ soil washing at the field scale has not yet been investigated as a remediation strategy for soils impacted by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). This remediation strategy is a promising low-cost alternative to other costlier remediation options like excavating, transporting and landfilling large amounts of PFAS contaminated soil. However, it is unclear if it is effective at the field scale, where large areas of heterogenous soil can be challenging to saturate with infiltration water and then pump to a treatment facility. To address this for the first time, herein we established three different trials involving in situ washing of an undisturbed, 3 m deep, sandy vadose zone soil contaminated with aqueous film forming foam (AFFF). The trials were performed at a site with an established pump and treat system for treating PFAS contaminated groundwater. In situ soil washing was compared to the more conventional practice of washing excavated soil on top of an impermeable bottom lining where the PFAS contaminated water was collected and monitored in a drainage system before treatment. The measured amount of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) removed was compared with expectations based on a non-calibrated, 1-D first order rate saturated soil model using only the local soil-to-water distribution coefficient as well as the volume and irrigation rate of wash water as input. This model predicted results within a factor of 2. The suspected reasons for small discrepancies between model predictions and excavated vs in situ washing was a combination of the heterogeneity of PFOS distribution in the soil as well as preferential flow paths during soil washing that prevented full saturation. This analysis showed that in situ soil washing was more efficient and less costly than washing excavated sandy soil, particularly if a pump-and-treat system is already in place.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleExcavated vs novel in situ soil washing as a remediation strategy for sandy soils impacted with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances from aqueous film forming foamsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-9en_US
dc.source.volume794en_US
dc.source.journalScience of the Total Environmenten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148763
dc.identifier.cristin1922328
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 302371en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal