Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHolz, Franziska
dc.contributor.authorScherwath, Tim
dc.contributor.authorCrespo del Granado, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorSkar, Christian
dc.contributor.authorOlmos, Luis
dc.contributor.authorPloussard, Quentin
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Andrés
dc.contributor.authorHerbst, Andrea
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-26T13:41:50Z
dc.date.available2022-01-26T13:41:50Z
dc.date.created2021-11-25T08:59:35Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Economics. 2021, 104, .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0140-9883
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2839491
dc.description.abstractCarbon Capture and Storage (CCS) might be a central technology to reach the decarbonisation goals of the European energy system. However, CCS deployment faces multiple economic, technological, and infrastructure challenges. Related literature tends to only focus on certain aspects of the CCS technology or to be limited to a particular sector perspective. In contrast, this paper presents a holistic modelling framework to analyse the long-term perspectives of CCS in Europe by extending the typical analysis from the electricity sector to the industry sector, and by including the CO2 infrastructure level with CO2 pipelines and storage. To this end, we use state-of-the-art models of the electricity sector (generation investment and electricity grid models), the industry sector, as well as the CO2 infrastructure sector. This unique modelling framework analyses the feasibility and costs of CCS deployment in the European Union towards 2050 in three scenarios with the same ambitious climate policy target (~85% CO2 emissions reduction). The main insights on the deployment of CCS in Europe hinges on two factors: i) the development of low-cost power generation technologies with carbon capture (coal and/or gas-fired), and ii) a sufficiently high CO2 price to compensate for the costs of deploying the CO2 transport infrastructure. Once CO2 transport infrastructure is available, CCS will be a preferred mitigation option for the industry sector emissions. The joint use of CO2 infrastructure by the electricity and the industry sector allows for economies of scale and economies of density. In the long term, CCS cannot achieve the 100% decarbonisation target of the energy sector because the technology can only capture 80–90% of the CO2 emissions of thermal power plants. Moreover, the advantages of CCS in terms of energy system costs compared to a system without CCS is rather small, in the range of 2%. It crucially depends on the costs of renewables and the costs of their integration in the electricity grid.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Scienceen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA 2050 perspective on the role for carbon capture and storage in the European power system and industry sectoren_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume104en_US
dc.source.journalEnergy Economicsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105631
dc.identifier.cristin1958776
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 296205en_US
dc.source.articlenumber105631en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal