Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHassan Abdalla, Elhadi Mohsen
dc.contributor.authorPons, Vincent
dc.contributor.authorStovin, Virginia
dc.contributor.authorDe-Ville, Simon
dc.contributor.authorFassman-Beck, Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorAlfredsen, Knut
dc.contributor.authorMuthanna, Tone Merete
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-16T08:56:00Z
dc.date.available2021-11-16T08:56:00Z
dc.date.created2021-11-15T09:23:37Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationHydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2021, 25 (11), 5917-5935.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1027-5606
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2829733
dc.description.abstractGreen roofs are increasingly popular measures to permanently reduce or delay storm-water runoff. The main objective of the study was to examine the potential of using machine learning (ML) to simulate runoff from green roofs to estimate their hydrological performance. Four machine learning methods, artificial neural network (ANN), M5 model tree, long short-term memory (LSTM) and k nearest neighbour (kNN), were applied to simulate storm-water runoff from 16 extensive green roofs located in four Norwegian cities across different climatic zones. The potential of these ML methods for estimating green roof retention was assessed by comparing their simulations with a proven conceptual retention model. Furthermore, the transferability of ML models between the different green roofs in the study was tested to investigate the potential of using ML models as a tool for planning and design purposes. The ML models yielded low volumetric errors that were comparable with the conceptual retention models, which indicates good performance in estimating annual retention. The ML models yielded satisfactory modelling results (NSE >0.5) in most of the roofs, which indicates an ability to estimate green roof detention. The variations in ML models' performance between the cities was larger than between the different configurations, which was attributed to the different climatic characteristics between the four cities. Transferred ML models between cities with similar rainfall events characteristics (Bergen–Sandnes, Trondheim–Oslo) could yield satisfactory modelling performance (Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency NSE >0.5 and percentage bias |PBIAS| <25 %) in most cases. However, we recommend the use of the conceptual retention model over the transferred ML models, to estimate the retention of new green roofs, as it gives more accurate volume estimates. Follow-up studies are needed to explore the potential of ML models in estimating detention from higher temporal resolution datasets.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherEuropean Geosciences Unionen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleEvaluating different machine learning methods to simulate runoff from extensive green roofsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber5917-5935en_US
dc.source.volume25en_US
dc.source.journalHydrology and Earth System Sciencesen_US
dc.source.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/hess-25-5917-2021
dc.identifier.cristin1954464
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal