Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorStrand, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorKjølaas, Jørn
dc.contributor.authorBergstrøm, Trond Harald
dc.contributor.authorSteinsland, Ingelin
dc.contributor.authorHellevik, Leif Rune
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-15T11:34:08Z
dc.date.available2021-11-15T11:34:08Z
dc.date.created2021-11-13T12:26:23Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2152-5080
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2829560
dc.description.abstractThe prediction uncertainty in simulators for industrial processes is due to uncertainties in the input variables and uncertainties in specification of the models, in particular the closure laws. In this work, the uncertainty in each closure law was modeled as a random variable and the parameters of its distribution were optimized to correctly quantify the uncertainty in predictions. We have developed two methods for optimization, based on the integrated quadratic distance and the energy score. The proposed methods were applied to the commercial multiphase flow simulator LedaFlow with the liquid volume fraction and pressure gradient as output variables. Two datasets were analyzed. Both describe two-phase gas-liquid flow, but are otherwise fundamentally different. One is gas-dominated stratified/annular flow and the other is liquid-dominated slug flow. The closure law for the gas-wall friction factor is decisive for the gas-dominated predictions, and the estimated relative standard deviation is 4.5% or 8.0% depending on method. The liquid-dominated study showed that the liquid-wall friction factor and the slug bubble velocity are the closure laws with the greatest impact. Moreover, the estimated relative standard deviation in the liquid-wall friction factor is 5%, and the deviation in the slug bubble velocity is 4%. We used direct measurements of the slug bubble velocity to validate the estimated uncertainty.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBegell Houseen_US
dc.titleClosure Law Model Uncertainty Quantificationen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThis is the authors' accepted manuscript to an article published by Begell House.en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal for Uncertainty Quantificationen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2021037714
dc.identifier.cristin1954255
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel