Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHorn, Julie
dc.contributor.advisorAalberg Vikjord, Sigrid Anna
dc.contributor.authorAspli, Sigrid
dc.contributor.authorAalberg Vikjord, Sigrid Anna
dc.contributor.authorLanghammer, Arnulf
dc.contributor.authorHorn, Julie
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-21T18:21:22Z
dc.date.available2021-10-21T18:21:22Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifierno.ntnu:inspera:71607394:15926186
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2824767
dc.descriptionFull text not available
dc.description.abstractSammendrag Mål: Målet med studien var å undersøke sammenhengen mellom bekkenbunnssvikt (nedfall, urininkontinens og analinkontinens) og beintetthet. Studiedesign: Vi gjennomførte en tverrsnittsstudie av 6,809 kvinner som deltok i den tredje populasjonsbaserte norske HUNT studien. Beintetthet ble gjort med dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Vi sammenlignet informasjon om beintetthet og sevrapporterte bekkenbunnssymptomer fra HUNT med sykehusdata på diagnoser og kirurgiske prosedyrer av bekkenbunnsplager. Utfall: Beintetthet ble kategorisert etter WHO sine kriterier (normal, osteopeni og osteoporose). Vi brukte multivariat logistisk regresjon i modeller for estimering av odds ratio med 95% konfidensintervaller for assosiasjonen mellom bekkenbunnsplager og beintetthet. Resultat: Kvinner med en sykehusdiagnose som stressinkontinens hadde mindre sannsynlighet for osteopeni (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.50-0.87) eller osteoporose (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.34-1.30) sammenlignet med kvinner uten en diagnose med stressinkontinens. Hos kvinner med selvrapportert informasjon om bekkenbunnsplager, hadde kvinner med stressinkontinens lavere odds for osteopeni (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.75-1.02) eller osteoporose (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.46-1.01), mens selvrapporterte kirurgiske prosedyrer for bekkenbunnsplager ikke var assosiert med osteopeni (OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.90-1.55) eller osteoporose (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.47-1.56). Konklusjon: Nedfall hos kvinner var ikke assosiert med beintetthet. Grunnene til den observerte assosiasjonen mellom stressinkontinens og beintetthet krever videre forskning.
dc.description.abstractAbstract Objectives: The aim was to examine the association between pelvic floor disorders (pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence and anal incontinence) and bone mineral density (BMD). Study design: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 6,809 women who participated in the third survey of the population-based Norwegian HUNT study. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. We linked information on BMD and self-reported pelvic floor disorders from HUNT with hospital-derived data on diagnosis and surgical treatment of pelvic floor disorders. Main outcome measure: BMD was categorized according to WHO criteria (normal, osteopenia and osteoporosis). We used multivariate logistic regression models to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between pelvic floor disorders and BMD. Results: Women with a hospital diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were less likely to have osteopenia (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.50-0.87) or osteoporosis (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.34-1.30) compared to women without a diagnosis of SUI. In women with self-reported information on pelvic floor disorders, women with a history of SUI had lower odds for osteopenia (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.75-1.02) or osteoporosis (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.46-1.01), while self-reported surgery for pelvic organ prolapse was not associated with osteopenia (OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.90-1.55) or osteoporosis (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.47-1.56). Conclusion: Pelvic organ prolapse was not associated with BMD. The reasons underlying the observed association between SUI and BMD requires further investigation.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherNTNU
dc.titleAssociation between Pelvic Floor Disorders and Bone Mineral Density: Findings from the HUNT study
dc.typeMaster thesis


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record