Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHansen, Tor Ivar
dc.contributor.authorBrezova, Veronika
dc.contributor.authorEikenes, Live
dc.contributor.authorHåberg, Asta
dc.contributor.authorVangberg, Torgil Riise
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-24T10:44:33Z
dc.date.available2021-09-24T10:44:33Z
dc.date.created2015-10-05T14:05:09Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology. 2015, 36 (8), 1450-1456.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0195-6108
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2781375
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The intracranial volume is commonly used for correcting regional brain volume measurements for variations in head size. Accurate intracranial volume measurements are important because errors will be propagated to the corrected regional brain volume measurements, possibly leading to biased data or decreased power. Our aims were to describe a fully automatic SPM-based method for estimating the intracranial volume and to explore the practical implications of different methods for obtaining the intracranial volume and normalization methods on statistical power. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We describe a method for calculating the intracranial volume that can use either T1-weighted or both T1- and T2-weighted MR images. The accuracy of the method was compared with manual measurements and automatic estimates by FreeSurfer and SPM-based methods. Sample size calculations on intracranial volume–corrected regional brain volumes with intracranial volume estimates from FreeSurfer, SPM, and our proposed method were used to explore the benefits of accurate intracranial volume estimates. RESULTS: The proposed method for estimating the intracranial volume compared favorably with the other methods evaluated here, with mean and absolute differences in manual measurements of −0.1% and 2.2%, respectively, and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.97 when using T1-weighted images. Using both T1- and T2-weighted images for estimating the intracranial volume slightly improved the accuracy. Sample size calculations showed that both the accuracy of intracranial volume estimates and the method for correcting the regional volume measurements affected the sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate intracranial volume estimates are most important for ratio-corrected regional brain volumes, for which our proposed method can provide increased power in intracranial volume–corrected regional brain volume data.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Neuroradiologyen_US
dc.titleHow Does the Accuracy of Intracranial Volume Measurements Affect Normalized Brain Volumes? Sample Size Estimates Based on 966 Subjects from the HUNT MRI Cohorten_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2015 by American Journal of Neuroradiology Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.orgen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1450-1456en_US
dc.source.volume36en_US
dc.source.journalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiologyen_US
dc.source.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3174/ajnr.A4299
dc.identifier.cristin1278465
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record