Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAl-Haidari, Ghazwan Ahmed Dhia Eldin
dc.contributor.authorSkovlund, Eva
dc.contributor.authorUndseth, Christine
dc.contributor.authorRekstad, Bernt Louni
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Steinar
dc.contributor.authorÅsli, Linn Merete
dc.contributor.authorDueland, Svein
dc.contributor.authorMalinen, Eirik
dc.contributor.authorGuren, Marianne
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-22T11:48:38Z
dc.date.available2021-09-22T11:48:38Z
dc.date.created2020-10-21T14:17:44Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationActa Oncologica. 2020, 59 (5), 534-540.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0284-186X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2780311
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is no clear consensus on the use of re-irradiation (reRT) in the management of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). The aim of the present study was to investigate all reRT administered for rectal cancer at a large referral institution and to evaluate patient outcomes and toxicity. Material and methods: All patients with rectal cancer were identified who had received previous pelvic radiotherapy (RT) and underwent reRT during 2006–2016. Medical records and RT details of the primary tumor treatments and rectal cancer recurrence treatments were registered, including details on reRT, chemotherapy, surgery, adverse events, and long-term outcomes. Results: Of 77 patients who received ReRT, 67 had previously received pelvic RT for rectal cancer and were administered reRT for LRRC. Re-irradiation doses were 30.0–45.0 Gy, most often given as hyperfractionated RT in 1.2–1.5 Gy fractions twice daily with concomitant capecitabine. The median time since initial RT was 29 months (range, 13–174 months). Of 36 patients considered as potentially resectable, 20 underwent surgery for LRRC within 3 months after reRT. Operated patients had better 3-year overall survival (OS) (62%) compared to those who were not operated (16%; HR 0.32, p = .001). The median gross tumor volume (GTV) was 107 cm3, and 3-year OS was significantly better in patients with GTV <107 cm3 (44%) compared to patients with GTV ≥107 cm3 (21%; HR 0.52, p = .03). Conclusion: Three-year survival was significantly better for patients who underwent surgery after reRT or who had small tumor volume. Prospective clinical trials are recommended for further improvements in patient selection, outcomes, and toxicity assessment.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.titleRe-irradiation for recurrent rectal cancer – a single-center experienceen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThis version of the article will not be available due to copyright restrictions by T&Fen_US
dc.source.pagenumber534-540en_US
dc.source.volume59en_US
dc.source.journalActa Oncologicaen_US
dc.source.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0284186X.2020.1725111
dc.identifier.cristin1841241
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel