Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorEnglund, Göran
dc.contributor.authorÖhlund, Gunnar
dc.contributor.authorOlajos, Fredrik
dc.contributor.authorFinstad, Anders Gravbrøt
dc.contributor.authorBellard, Celine
dc.contributor.authorHugueny, Bernard
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-24T13:36:07Z
dc.date.available2021-02-24T13:36:07Z
dc.date.created2020-11-04T16:24:31Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Animal Ecology. 2020, 89 (5), 1202-1215.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0021-8790
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2730158
dc.description.abstractLoss of habitat and changes in the spatial configuration of habitats are major drivers of species extinctions, but the responses to these drivers differ between organisms. To advance theory on how extinction risk from different types of habitat alteration relates to species‐specific traits, there is a need for studies of the long‐term extinction dynamic of individual species. The goal of this study was to quantify how habitat area and the spatial configuration of habitats affect extinction rate of an aquatic top predator, the northern pike Esox lucius L. We recorded the presence/absence of northern pike in 398 isolated habitat fragments, each one consisting of a number of interconnected lakes. Time since isolation of the habitat fragments, caused by cut‐off from the main dispersal source in the Baltic Sea, varied between 0 and 10,000 years. Using survival regression, we analysed how pike population survival was affected by time since isolation, habitat size and habitat subdivision. The approach builds on the assumptions that pike colonized all fragments before isolation and that current absences result from extinctions. We verified these assumptions by testing (a) if pike was present in the region throughout the entire time period when the lakes formed and (b) if pike typically colonize lakes that are formed today. We also addressed the likelihood that unrecorded anthropogenic introductions could bias our estimates of extinction rate. Our results supported the interpretation that current patterns of presence/absence in our study system are shaped by extinctions. Further, we found that time since isolation and fragment area had strong effects on pike population survival. In contrast, spatial habitat subdivision (i.e. if a fragment contained few large lakes or many small lakes) and other environmental covariates describing climate and productivity were unrelated to pike survival. Over all, extinction rate was high in young fragments and decreased sharply with increasing fragment age. Our study demonstrates how the link between extinction rate and habitat size and spatial structure can be quantified. More similar studies may help us find generalizations that can guide management of habitat size and connectivity.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.titleHolocene extinctions of a top predator—Effects of time, habitat area and habitat subdivisionen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1202-1215en_US
dc.source.volume89en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Animal Ecologyen_US
dc.source.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2656.13174
dc.identifier.cristin1845001
dc.description.localcode. This is the peer reviewed version of an article, which has been published in final form at [https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13174]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. "en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel