Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFosse, Roar
dc.contributor.authorSkjelstad, Dag Vegard
dc.contributor.authorSchalinski, Inga
dc.contributor.authorThekkumthala, Dorothea
dc.contributor.authorElbert, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorAanondsen, Chris Margaret
dc.contributor.authorGreger, Hanne Klæboe
dc.contributor.authorJozefiak, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-17T14:01:55Z
dc.date.available2021-02-17T14:01:55Z
dc.date.created2020-06-30T11:19:04Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationPLOS ONE. 2020, 15 (2), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2728716
dc.description.abstractPurpose Adverse childhood experiences in sensitive periods of the developing brain render the individual at a life-long risk for a broad spectrum of aberrant health outcomes. However, there is a lack of scales for the comprehensive assessment of adverse childhood experiences providing information of various types and the age of occurrence. Based on the complete, experimental version of the Maltreatment and abuse chronology of exposure (MACE-X) scale, the present study aimed to develop and psychometrically test a Norwegian version of MACE. Methods The 75-item MACE-X was translated from German to Norwegian and administered as a self-report measure to 90 outpatients and 145 employees at a Division of specialized mental health care in South-Eastern Norway. The outpatients also completed the Childhood trauma questionnaire (CTQ) and the Symptom checklist 90 (SCL-90) to investigate convergent and predictive validity. To investigate test-retest reliability, outpatients completed MACE once more two weeks later. Results Rasch analysis and Anderson likelihood ratio tests on the combined outpatient and employee data resulted in a 55 item version of the Norwegian MACE. In the outpatient group, test-retest reliability of the MACE-55 was excellent for total scores (ICC ≥ 0.94) and good to excellent for 10 subscale scores (ICC ≥ 0.82). Convergent validity with the CTQ was moderate to high for both total scores (0.63 ≥ r ≥ 0.86) and subscale scores (0.56 ≥ r ≥ 0.82). As compared to CTQ total scores, a MACE total score that combined severity and duration of exposure was numerically more strongly associated with overall psychiatric symptoms and each of nine symptom domains on the SCL-90. Conclusions The newly developed Norwegian MACE comprehensively assesses past exposure to adverse childhood experiences with high psychometric properties. This scale is a useful tool for research questions addressing sensitive periods for childhood adversities and associated health phenotypes.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPLOS, Public Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleMeasuring childhood maltreatment: Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure (MACE) scaleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber19en_US
dc.source.volume15en_US
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0229661
dc.identifier.cristin1817764
dc.description.localcodeCopyright: © 2020 Fosse et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal