| dc.contributor.author | Abomhara, Mohamed | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yildirim Yayilgan, Sule | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shalaginova, Marina | |
| dc.contributor.author | Székely, Zoltán | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-27T08:00:11Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-03-27T08:00:11Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2020-03-25T22:37:19Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-3-030-42503-6 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2649009 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper discusses concerns pertaining to the absoluteness of the right to privacy regarding the use of biometric data for border control. The discussion explains why privacy cannot be absolute from different points of view, including privacy versus national security, privacy properties conflicting with border risk analysis, and Privacy by Design (PbD) and engineering design challenges. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Springer Nature | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Privacy and Identity Management. Data for Better Living: AI and Privacy | |
| dc.title | Border Control and Use of Biometrics: Reasons Why the Right to Privacy Can Not Be Absolute | en_US |
| dc.type | Chapter | en_US |
| dc.description.version | acceptedVersion | en_US |
| dc.source.pagenumber | 259-271 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/978-3-030-42504-3_17 | |
| dc.identifier.cristin | 1803613 | |
| dc.description.localcode | This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of a chapter published in [Privacy and Identity Management. Data for Better Living: AI and Privacy] Locked until 6.3.2022 due to copyright restrictions. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42504-3_17 | en_US |
| cristin.ispublished | true | |
| cristin.fulltext | postprint | |
| cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |
