Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorTuovinen, Juha Pekka
dc.contributor.authorAurela, Mika
dc.contributor.authorHatakka, Juha
dc.contributor.authorRäsänen, Tuomas Aleksi
dc.contributor.authorVirtanen, Tarmo
dc.contributor.authorMikola, Juha
dc.contributor.authorIvakhov, Viktor
dc.contributor.authorKondratyev, Vladimir
dc.contributor.authorLaurila, Tuomas
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-10T08:06:47Z
dc.date.available2020-02-10T08:06:47Z
dc.date.created2019-09-20T11:20:51Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationBiogeosciences. 2019, 16 (2), 255-274.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1726-4170
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2640567
dc.description.abstractThe non-uniform spatial integration, an inherent feature of the eddy covariance (EC) method, creates a challenge for flux data interpretation in a heterogeneous environment, where the contribution of different land cover types varies with flow conditions, potentially resulting in biased estimates in comparison to the areally averaged fluxes and land cover attributes. We modelled flux footprints and characterized the spatial scale of our EC measurements in Tiksi, a tundra site in northern Siberia. We used leaf area index (LAI) and land cover class (LCC) data, derived from very-high-spatial-resolution satellite imagery and field surveys, and quantified the sensor location bias. We found that methane (CH4) fluxes varied strongly with wind direction (−0.09 to 0.59 µgCH4m−2s−1 on average) during summer 2014, reflecting the distribution of different LCCs. Other environmental factors had only a minor effect on short-term flux variations but influenced the seasonal trend. Using footprint weights of grouped LCCs as explanatory variables for the measured CH4 flux, we developed a multiple regression model to estimate LCC group-specific fluxes. This model showed that wet fen and graminoid tundra patches in locations with topography-enhanced wetness acted as strong sources (1.0 µgCH4m−2s−1 during the peak emission period), while mineral soils were significant sinks (−0.13 µgCH4m−2s−1). To assess the representativeness of measurements, we upscaled the LCC group-specific fluxes to different spatial scales. Despite the landscape heterogeneity and rather poor representativeness of EC data with respect to the areally averaged LAI and coverage of some LCCs, the mean flux was close to the CH4 balance upscaled to an area of 6.3 km2, with a location bias of 14 %. We recommend that EC site descriptions in a heterogeneous environment should be complemented with footprint-weighted high-resolution data on vegetation and other site characteristics.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherEuropean Geosciences Unionnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleInterpreting eddy covariance data from heterogeneous Siberian tundra: Land-cover-specific methane fluxes and spatial representativenessnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber255-274nb_NO
dc.source.volume16nb_NO
dc.source.journalBiogeosciencesnb_NO
dc.source.issue2nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/bg-16-255-2019
dc.identifier.cristin1727134
dc.description.localcode© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,67,10,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for geografi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal