Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCook, Jonathan A.
dc.contributor.authorHislop, Jenni
dc.contributor.authorAltman, Douglas G.
dc.contributor.authorFayers, Peter
dc.contributor.authorBriggs, Andrew H.
dc.contributor.authorRamsay, Craig R.
dc.contributor.authorNorrie, John D.
dc.contributor.authorHarvey, Ian M.
dc.contributor.authorBuckley, Brian
dc.contributor.authorFergusson, D
dc.contributor.authorFord, Ian
dc.contributor.authorVale, Luke D.
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-25T07:47:35Z
dc.date.available2019-11-25T07:47:35Z
dc.date.created2015-09-18T10:28:59Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationTrials. 2015, 16 (12)nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2630166
dc.description.abstractBackground Central to the design of a randomised controlled trial is the calculation of the number of participants needed. This is typically achieved by specifying a target difference and calculating the corresponding sample size, which provides reassurance that the trial will have the required statistical power (at the planned statistical significance level) to identify whether a difference of a particular magnitude exists. Beyond pure statistical or scientific concerns, it is ethically imperative that an appropriate number of participants should be recruited. Despite the critical role of the target difference for the primary outcome in the design of randomised controlled trials, its determination has received surprisingly little attention. This article provides guidance on the specification of the target difference for the primary outcome in a sample size calculation for a two parallel group randomised controlled trial with a superiority question. Methods This work was part of the DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) project. Draft guidance was developed by the project steering and advisory groups utilising the results of the systematic review and surveys. Findings were circulated and presented to members of the combined group at a face-to-face meeting, along with a proposed outline of the guidance document structure, containing recommendations and reporting items for a trial protocol and report. The guidance and was subsequently drafted and circulated for further comment before finalisation. Results Guidance on specification of a target difference in the primary outcome for a two group parallel randomised controlled trial was produced. Additionally, a list of reporting items for protocols and trial reports was generated. Conclusions Specification of the target difference for the primary outcome is a key component of a randomized controlled trial sample size calculation. There is a need for better justification of the target difference and reporting of its specification.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBioMed Centralnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSpecifying the target difference in the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial: Guidance for researchersnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.volume16nb_NO
dc.source.journalTrialsnb_NO
dc.source.issue12nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13063-014-0526-8
dc.identifier.cristin1265389
dc.description.localcode© 2015 The Authors. Open Access CC-BYnb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,65,15,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for klinisk og molekylær medisin
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal