Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWallin, Patric
dc.contributor.authorBolstad, Torstein
dc.contributor.authorLundheim, Lars Magne
dc.contributor.authorTybell, Per Thomas Martin
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-22T08:55:02Z
dc.date.available2019-02-22T08:55:02Z
dc.date.created2018-12-04T10:23:06Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.isbn978-2-87352-016-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2586925
dc.description.abstractIntroduction The integration of project based learning (PBL) into engineering curriculums has received growing interest in the engineering education research literature [1]. One particular area of interest is the first year in engineering programs [2], as it establishes the cognitive, affective, and conative foundation for students and is also closely linked to student retention and academic success [3]. At the same time, many engineering programs remain focused around theory heavy courses that provide little coupling to actual engineering practices in the first year. Balancing engineering science and engineering practices is challenging, and students often find it difficult to establish connections between different concepts, practices, and areas of engineering [4]. Furthermore, first year engineering students at today’s universities often are enrolled in large anonymous courses on e.g. math, mechanics, and electronics with hundreds of other students across different engineering disciplines. Within this environment, it is difficult for the students to identify themselves as engineers in making, and be part of a disciplinary socialization process right from their first semester [5]. The context for this study is a re-designed electrical engineering program that aims at providing students with opportunities to learn engineering practices right from the start, while at the same time maintaining some of the traditional large, theory heavy, courses. Here, we explore how first year students perceive their learning environment and their transition to university. Using a national student survey as an entry point, we briefly compare the program to other electrical engineering programs in Norway before exploring the how and why of students’ experiences in detail through in-depth interviews. A thematic qualitative analysis approach leads to the identification of two emergent themes that are central for the students: socialization and curriculum integration.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherSEFI Brussels, Belgium Brussel, Belgianb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference
dc.titleSocialization and Curriculum Integration: Emergent premises in student experiences of a first-year electrical engineering coursenb_NO
dc.typeChapternb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber495-502nb_NO
dc.identifier.cristin1638817
dc.description.localcodeThis chapter will not be available due to copyright restrictions (c) 2018 by SEFI Brussels, Belgium Brussel, Belgianb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,67,70,0
cristin.unitcode194,63,35,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for pedagogikk og livslang læring
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for elektroniske systemer
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel