The value of incorporating personally relevant stimuli into consciousness assessment with the Coma Recovery Scale - Revised: A pilot study.
Journal article, Peer reviewed
Published version
![Thumbnail](/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2557739/2390.pdf.jpg?sequence=6&isAllowed=y)
Åpne
Permanent lenke
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2557739Utgivelsesdato
2018Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
Originalversjon
10.2340/16501977-2309Sammendrag
Objective: To explore whether the use of personally relevant stimuli, for some tasks in the Coma Recovery Scale – Revised (CRS-R), generates more responses in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness compared with neutral stimuli.
Design: Multiple single-case design.
Subjects: Three patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness recruited from an inpatient department at a regional brain injury rehabilitation clinic in Stockholm, Sweden.
Methods: Patients were repeatedly assessed with the CRS-R. Randomization tests (bootstrapping) were used to compare the number of responses generated by personally relevant and neutral stimuli on 5 items in the CRS-R.
Results: Compared with neutral stimuli, photographs of relatives generated significantly more visual fixations. A mirror generated visual pursuit to a significantly greater extent than other self-relevant stimuli. On other items, no significant differences between neutral and personally relevant stimuli were seen.
Conclusion: Personally relevant visual stimuli may minimize the risk of missing visual fixation, compared with the neutral stimuli used in the current gold standard behavioural assessment measure (CRS-R). However, due to the single-subject design this conclusion is tentative and more research is needed.